Solid waste: tire recycling: architectural paint recovery program.
Summary
(1) The California Tire Recycling Act imposes a California tire fee on a new tire purchased in the state. The revenue generated from the fee is deposited in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of programs related to waste tires, including grants to local entities involved in activities that result in reduced landfill disposal of used whole tires. The act requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to adopt a 5-year plan, which is to be updated biennially, to establish goals and priorities for waste tire programs. This bill would require the department to provide outreach to local agencies regarding a program it may establish under existing law to award grants to cities, counties, and other local government agencies for the funding of public works projects that use waste tires. The bill would make the public works waste tire grant program inoperative on June 30, 2015, and would repeal the provision authorizing this program on January 1, 2016. The bill would also make conforming changes with regard to the department's 5-year plan. (2) Existing law creates an architectural paint recovery program that is enforced by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. On or before April 1, 2012, a manufacturer or designated stewardship organization is required to submit to the department an architectural paint stewardship plan to develop and implement a recovery program to reduce the generation of postconsumer paint, promote the reuse of postconsumer architectural paint, and manage the end-of-life of postconsumer architectural paint, in an environmentally sound fashion, including collection, transportation, processing, and disposal. The plan is required to contain specified elements of an architectural paint stewardship program, including, but not limited to, an architectural paint stewardship assessment, approved by the department, on each container of architectural paint sold in this state. Existing law prohibits a manufacturer or retailer from selling or offering for sale architectural paint to any person in this state, unless the manufacturer is listed on the department's Internet Web site as being in compliance with the program. Existing law authorizes the department to administratively impose civil penalties for violations of the act. Existing law requires a stewardship organization to pay the department annual administrative fees in the amount that is sufficient to cover the department's full costs of administering and enforcing the program. This bill would establish the Architectural Paint Stewardship Account in the Integrated Waste Management Fund, would require the fees to be deposited in this account, and would require the department to expend those fees, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department's costs to implement the program. The bill would also establish the Architectural Paint Stewardship Penalty Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Fund, would require the penalties collected to be deposited in that subaccount, and would authorize the department to expend those funds, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department's costs to implement the program.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Sep 8, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
11
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-5)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 3131.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (September 7).
upper
Sep 2, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Sep 2, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 11).
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 525
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 525. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline