Vehicles: reckless driving: suspension of licenses.
Summary
Existing law requires a person's driving privilege to be suspended upon conviction of specified driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offenses for one year. Existing law terminates the licensing suspension if certain conditions are met, including if the person is eligible to apply for a restricted license. Under existing law, a person who drives a vehicle upon a highway in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of a person or property is guilty of reckless driving. Existing law provides that, when a person is charged with, and pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, reckless driving in satisfaction of, or as a substitute for, an original charge for a DUI, and the court accepts the plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the conviction is a prior offense for purposes of specified laws relating to punishments imposed for DUI convictions. This bill would terminate a driver's license suspension, and make the person eligible for a restricted driver's license, for a person convicted of reckless driving in satisfaction of, or substitute for, an original charge of driving-under-the-influence, if certain conditions are met, including that the person complete a 90-day suspension period and install an ignition interlock device. The bill would require the department to advise the person of the above conditions. The bill would require that the restricted driver's license privilege be subject to certain restrictions, including, among other things, that upon receipt of notification from the installer that a person has attempted to remove, bypass, or tamper with the ignition interlock device, the privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall immediately be suspended. The bill would make other technical and conforming changes to these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
30–4
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic24
83% Yea
R
Republican15
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
11
Committee
14
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 3119.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (September 8).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-4-5)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-27-5)
assembly
May 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
lower
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 520
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 520. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline