Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, executed on March 27, 2012. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions may not be deemed projects for purposes of CEQA. By imposing additional duties on a lead agency with regard to the implementation of CEQA requirements, this bill would increase the service provided by a local agency, thereby creating a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
May 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
May 2012
Signed into Law
May 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Signed May 17, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 7, 2012 · Assembly May 10, 2012
How they voted
27–4
Passed
Total votes 31
May 7, 2012
D
Democratic20
80% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
May 17, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-2-6)
assembly
May 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 70. Noes 3. Page 4763.).
lower
May 7, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-4)
senate
May 7, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after May 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 517
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 517. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline