Greenhouse gases.
Summary
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. The state board is required to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020, and to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The act authorizes the state board to include use of market-based compliance mechanisms. Existing law requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected by the state board from the auction or sale of allowances as part of a market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature. Under the Public Utilities Act, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory jurisdiction over public utilities, including electrical corporations. A violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Existing law requires the commission, except as provided, to require revenues, including any accrued interest, received by an electrical corporation as a result of the direct allocation of greenhouse gas allowances to electric utilities to be credited directly to the residential, small business, public transportation agency, and emissions-intensive trade-exposed retail customers of the electrical corporation. This bill would also require the revenues to be credited to public transportation agency customers, and would define "public transportation agency" for that purpose. Because a violation of a requirement of the commission is a crime. This bill would impose a State-mandated local program by changing the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Last action Aug 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 16, 2011
How they voted
39–27
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
May 16, 2011
D
Democratic44
88% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jul 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 16, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-27-4)
assembly
Apr 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 485
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 485. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline