Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosure.
Summary
Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing, including requiring the reporting of campaign contributions and expenditures and imposing other reporting and recordkeeping requirements on campaign committees. This bill would require each campaign committee to identify its principal officer or officers, as defined, and would require each principal officer to maintain the committee's accounts and records. In addition, the bill would require a committee's principal officer, in the event the committee files a statement or report disclosing an independent expenditure, to sign a verification verifying that the committee has not received unreported contributions or reimbursements to make the independent expenditure and has not coordinated with the candidate or the opponent of the candidate or the proponent or the opponent of the state measure that is the subject of the expenditure. The Political Reform Act of 1974 defines "late contribution" and "late independent expenditure" as any contribution or independent expenditure totaling in the aggregate $1,000 or more that is made for or against any specific candidate, committee, or measure involved in an election that is made or received before the date of the election but after the closing date of the last campaign statement required to be filed prior to the election. This bill would instead define "late contribution" and "late independent expenditure" to mean a contribution or independent expenditure made within 90 days before the date of the election at which the candidate or measure is to be voted on. The Political Reform Act of 1974 requires that broadcast and mass mailing advertisements supporting or opposing candidates or ballot measures include disclosure statements that reflect specified information. This bill would require any advertisement supporting or opposing candidates or ballot measures to include such disclosure statements. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Signed Sep 24, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2012 · Assembly May 12, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
11
Committee
16
Amendments
1
Sep 24, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 11. Page 6753.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 8).
upper
Jun 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
May 12, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-24-5)
assembly
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 481
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 481. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline