Schools: open enrollment.
Summary
Existing law, the Open Enrollment Act, allows the parent of a pupil enrolled in a low-achieving school to submit an application for the pupil to attend school in a school district other than the school district in which the parent of the pupil resides, but in which the parent nevertheless intends to enroll the pupil. Existing law defines a low-achieving school, for purposes of these provisions, as a school identified by the Superintendent of Public Instruction by inclusion on a list of 1,000 schools ranked by increasing Academic Performance Index score. Existing law provides that no local educational agency may have more than 10% of its schools on the list and that specified types of schools, including charter schools, may not be included on the list. This bill would instead provide that the list created by the Superintendent to define low-achieving schools may include up to 1,000 schools, that a local educational agency shall not have more than 10% of its schools on the list, calculated as specified, and that county offices of education operating a special education program and state special schools not be included on the list. The bill would also provide that a school shall only be identified as a low-achieving school if it is identified on the list for 2 consecutive years and would delete the provision excluding charter schools from inclusion on the list. Existing law requires a school district of enrollment to conduct a lottery to select pupils at random if the number of pupils who request a particular school exceeds the number of spaces available at that school. This bill would provide that a school district of enrollment shall not reject the transfer of an individual with exceptional needs or an English learner if he or she is randomly selected through the lottery.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Vetoed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
44–24
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 70
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Oct 8, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 2895.).
lower
Sep 1, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-24-2)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 30).
lower
Jan 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 47
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 47. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline