Environment: Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006.
Summary
(1) The Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative statute approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, makes approximately $5.4 billion in bond funds available for safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, natural resource protection, and park improvements. The bond act makes $60,000,000 available to the State Department of Public Health (department) for the purpose of loans and grants for projects to prevent or reduce contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of drinking water and requires the department to require repayment for costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination. Existing law requires the department, in collaboration with the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the State Water Resources Control Board, to develop and adopt regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater. Existing law, the Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act, creates in the General Fund the Site Remediation Account, and authorizes the money in that account to be expended by the DTSC, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for direct site remediation costs. This bill would require the department to adopt the implementing regulations as emergency regulations, pursuant to a specified procedure, and would require the emergency regulations to remain in effect for 180 days after the effective date of those emergency regulations, by which time the department would be required to adopt regulations. The bill would require the regulations to include a provision allowing the department to enter into an agreement with a grantee that recovers the funds that would authorize the expenditure of the recovered funds to implement ongoing treatment and remediation activities in accordance with the purposes for which funds may be granted pursuant to the bond act. The bill would establish the Groundwater Contamination Prevention Account in the State Treasury and would require the department to deposit in that account the funds recovered from responsible parties pursuant to the payment recovery provisions in the bond act. The bill would continuously appropriate funds in the account to the department for purposes of implementing the groundwater contamination cleanup and prevention provisions of the bond act, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would authorize the department to expend up to 3% of the recovered funds deposited in the Groundwater Contamination Prevention Account to pay for the department's oversight costs. The bill would authorize the department to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the DTSC to provide oversight activities or to transfer funds from the Groundwater Contamination Prevention Account to the Site Remediation Account. The bill would appropriate the transferred funds to the DTSC for purposes of implementing the department's agreement with a grantee. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Vetoed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly Jan 31, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
10
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 25, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6249.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 14, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Jan 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 19).
lower
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on W., P. & W. and E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
Ed Hernandez
DDemocratic
Co
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 467
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 467. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline