Guardianship.
Summary
Existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, authorizes a court, upon hearing of a petition, to appoint a guardian of a person or estate of the proposed ward in accordance with specified provisions of law governing the custody of a minor child. This bill would prohibit a court from appointing a minor's parent as a guardian of the person of the minor, except as specified. The bill would establish requirements for transferring a proceeding to another court in circumstances in which a proceeding that concerns custody or visitation of a minor child is pending in one or more counties at the time the petition for guardianship is filed, and would specify circumstances under which the court in a guardianship proceeding would maintain exclusive jurisdiction to determine issues of custody or visitation. The bill would also require the court in which a guardianship proceeding is filed to communicate with each court where a custody or visitation proceeding is pending prior to making a determination on maintaining or transferring the guardianship proceeding, and would require the Judicial Council, on or before January 1, 2013, to adopt rules of court to implement this provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Signed Jul 25, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 1, 2011 · Assembly Apr 14, 2011
How they voted
26–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 31
Jul 1, 2011
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jul 25, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-0-5)
senate
Jul 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (52-0-17)
assembly
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 22).
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 458
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 458. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline