AB 446 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Juveniles: restorative justice program.

Summary
Existing law sets forth the purpose of juvenile court law, and provides that a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court who is in need of protective services shall receive care, treatment, and guidance consistent with his or her best interest and the best interest of the public. Existing law provides that a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a consequence of delinquent conduct shall, in conformity with the interests of public safety and protection, receive care, treatment, and guidance that is consistent with his or her best interest, that holds the minor accountable for his or her behavior, and that is appropriate for his or her circumstances. This bill would authorize a county to adopt a restorative justice program to address the needs of minors, victims, and the community. The bill would require the restorative justice program to be implemented through a restorative justice protocol developed by the juvenile court in conjunction with the prosecutor, public defender, and other interested groups. The bill would prohibit the use of General Fund moneys to fund the program. The bill would include related findings and declarations.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 15, 2011 Vetoed Sep 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2011 · Assembly May 16, 2011

How they voted

218
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2011
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
2 Yea 8 Nay 1
72% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Sep 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 22, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-8-2)
senate
Aug 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 16, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-22-6)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
CA
62