County free libraries: withdrawal: use of private contractors.
Summary
Existing law provides that the county boards of supervisors may establish and maintain, within their respective counties, county free libraries pursuant to specified provisions of law. Existing law provides that the board of trustees, common council, or other legislative body of any city or the board of trustees of any library district may, on or before January 1 of any year, notify the county board of supervisors that the city or library district no longer desires to be a part of the county free library system, as specified. This bill would impose specified requirements if the board of trustees, common council, or other legislative body of a city or the board of trustees of a library district intends to withdraw from the county free library system and operate the city's or library district's library or libraries with a private contractor that will employ library staff to achieve cost savings, unless the library or libraries are funded only by the proceeds of a special tax imposed by the city or library district. These requirements, until January 1, 2019, would include, but not be limited to, publishing notice of the contemplated action in a specified manner, clearly demonstrating that the contract will result in actual overall cost savings to the city or library district for the duration of the entire contract, as specified, prohibiting the contract from causing existing city or library district employees to incur a loss of employment or specified benefits or an involuntary transfer, and imposing specified requirements on contracts for library services in excess of $100,000 annually. The bill would also provide that its provisions do not preclude a city, library district, or local government from adopting more restrictive rules regarding the contracting of public services, and would prohibit its provisions from applying to contracts between a city or library district and a nonprofit organization if specified requirements are met.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly Jun 3, 2011
How they voted
22–12
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 8, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-12-1)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 45. Noes 28. Page 3147.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 3, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-27-8)
assembly
Jun 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 2).
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 438
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 438. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline