Public works: labor compliance.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the awarding body for a public works project to not require the payment of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages on public works projects of specified sizes and types of work, if the awarding body elects to initiate and enforce a labor compliance program containing specified requirements for every public works project under the authority of the awarding body or the awarding body elects to meet certain requirements with regard to any public works project under its authority, including payment of a fee to the Department of Industrial Relations for the enforcement of prevailing wage obligations, as specified, which may be waived under specified circumstances, determined by the department and deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law also requires the Director of Industrial Relations, with the approval of the Director of Finance, to assess a fee on any awarding body using funds derived from any bonds issued by the state to fund public works projects, as specified, which are deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Existing law also requires an awarding body that chooses to use funds derived from either the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002 or the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, or the body awarding any contract for a public works project financed in any part with funds made available by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 or the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, to pay a fee to the department sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance enforcement, as specified, to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund. Existing law authorizes the department to waive the fee where specified criteria are met. Existing law gives specified authority for certain school district governing boards, governing boards of community college districts and community college facility construction projects, cities, counties, qualified entities that operate a wastewater facility, solid waste management facility, or water recycling facility, transit operators, and unified school districts to enter into design-build contracts for specified projects if certain requirements are met, including the establishment and enforcement of a labor compliance program or the contracting with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law gives specified authority for the San Diego Model School Development Agency to award construction contracts, as specified, and requires it to establish and enforce a labor compliance program or to contract with a 3rd party to operate a labor compliance program. Existing law requires entities contracting under the above provisions to pay a fee to the department, established by the department as specified, sufficient to support the department's costs in ensuring compliance with and enforcing prevailing wage requirements on the project and labor compliance. Existing law requires all fees collected pursuant to these provisions to be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund and to be used only for enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on those projects and authorizes the department to waive the fee if specified criteria are met. This bill would make revisions regarding the method by which the Department of Industrial Relations sets reimbursement rates for its costs of performing prevailing wage monitoring and enforcement on the specified public works projects described above, when the reimbursement to the department may be waived, and would exempt from the above-described requirements those public works projects financed in any part by the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002. This bill would also provide that, upon an order of the Director of Finance, a loan in an amount not to exceed $4,300,000 shall be made from the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund to the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, thereby depositing additional moneys into a continuously appropriated fund.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
44–22
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
17
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 3190.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 8).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the measure be returned to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (September 1).
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jul 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 11).
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-22-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & E. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 1, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 436
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 436. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline