AB 432 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Transit: Sacramento County.

Summary
Existing law authorizes transportation planning agencies to administer transit funding made available under the Transportation Development Act. Existing law imposes certain financial requirements on transit operators making claims for transit funds, including requirements that fares collected by the operator cover a specified percentage of operating costs. In certain cases, transit operators are required to meet a higher percentage if they met that standard in the 1978–79 fiscal year. Existing law permits the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to make a determination as to whether transit operators serving a specified area have met the requirements for claims for transit funds by evaluating the operators as a group rather than individually. This bill would authorize the Sacramento Area Council of Governments to determine whether transit operators serving Sacramento County, as a group, have met the requirements for claims for transit funds. The bill would require the Sacramento Regional Transit District to cover no less than 23% of operating costs from fares even if the transit operators serving Sacramento County are evaluated as a group under this provision.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 14, 2011 Signed Sep 7, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 6, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2011

How they voted

330
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 6, 2012
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican12
12 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
14
Amendments
1
Sep 7, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 17. Page 6145.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (August 20).
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 5, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors