AB 41 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

High-Speed Rail Authority: conflicts of interest: disqualification.

Summary
Existing provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 prohibit a public official at any level of state or local government from making, participating in making, or attempting to use his or her official position to influence a governmental decision in which he or she knows or has reason to know that he or she has a financial interest, as defined. Existing law also requires specified elected and appointed officers at the state and local levels of government to disclose specified financial interests by filing periodic statements of economic interests. Existing law further requires public officials who hold specified offices and who have a financial interest in a decision within the meaning of the Political Reform Act of 1974 to publicly identify the financial interest giving rise to the conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest, recuse themselves from discussing and voting on the matter, and leave the room until after the discussion, vote, and other disposition of the matter is concluded, except as specified. This bill would add members of the High-Speed Rail Authority to those specified officers who must publicly identify a financial interest giving rise to a conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest, and recuse themselves accordingly. Existing law requires each state agency to adopt a conflict-of-interest code and to designate those employees of the agency who are subject to the provisions of the conflict-of-interest code. Existing law requires that each agency's conflict-of-interest code contain specified provisions, including requirements that each designated employee file periodic statements of economic interests and provisions setting forth circumstances under which a designated employee must disqualify himself or herself from participating in a governmental decision. Existing law further imposes various other restrictions on individuals who are designated employees, including postgovernment employment restrictions and restrictions regarding the acceptance of gifts and honoraria. This bill would provide that each individual who is selected by the authority to serve in a peer review capacity to the authority shall be deemed to be a designated employee of the authority, thereby making those persons subject to the provisions of the authority's conflict-of-interest code and to the various other restrictions that apply to the designated employees of a state agency. Existing law makes a violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 subject to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by exposing these members and designated employees to potential criminal penalties for failing to make the disclosures and recuse themselves where required by this bill. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 87200 of the Government Code proposed by AB 2609, that would become operative only if AB 2609 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Dec 6, 2010 Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2012 · Assembly Aug 31, 2012

How they voted

290
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2012
D Democratic20
18 Yea 2
90% Yea
R Republican11
11 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-2-4)
assembly
Aug 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 2. Page 6689.).
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 16, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jerry Hill
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
CA
13