Newborn screening program.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a program for the development, provision, and evaluation of genetic disease testing. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Genetic Disease Testing Fund (GDTF) , consisting of fees paid for newborn screening tests. Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that all costs of the genetic disease testing program be fully supported by fees paid for newborn screening tests, which are deposited in the GDTF. Existing law also authorizes moneys in the GDTF to be used for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include cystic fibrosis and biotinidase and exempts the expansion of contracts for this purpose from certain provisions of the Public Contract Code, the Government Code, and the State Administrative Manual, as specified. This bill would require the department to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and, insofar as it does not require additional costs, other T-cell lymphopenias detectable as a result of screening for SCID, and would make related changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Oct 4, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2011 · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Oct 4, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-3-5)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 395
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 395. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline