Resources: watersheds.
Summary
The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, among other things, prohibits a person from conducting timber operations unless a timber harvesting plan prepared by a registered professional forester has been submitted to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and unless the plan has been approved. Existing law requires the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to adopt certain forest practice rules and regulations to minimize the effects of erosion on water resources and lakes. This bill would require the department and the board, when implementing a pilot project to protect and restore the riparian zone in watersheds with listed anadromous salmonids, among other things, to provide the industry, agencies, and the public with the opportunity to participate in the development of the pilot project in a transparent manner and to ensure that the pilot project has certain goals. The bill would also require certain documents to be publicly available on the board's Internet Web Site and all documents that form the basis for the pilot projects to be posted on the department's Internet Web site. The bill would require the board, with the assistance of a technical advisory committee, to develop recommendations and pass regulations for providing electronic public access to all relevant documents, organized by the California Interagency Watershed Mapping Committee, that assist the department in administering timber harvest regulations with actions that protect and recover forest and watershed productivity and quality.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 70
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic44
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on W., P. & W. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 21).
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and W., P. & W.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 380
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 380. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline