Pharmacy.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacies, including hospital pharmacies, by the California State Board of Pharmacy, and makes a knowing violation of that law a crime. Existing law prohibits the operation of a pharmacy without a license and a separate license is required for each pharmacy location. Under existing law, a hospital pharmacy, as defined, includes a pharmacy located outside of the hospital in another physical plant. However, as a condition of licensure by the board for these pharmacies, pharmaceutical services may only be provided to registered hospital patients who are on the premises of the same physical plant in which the pharmacy is located and those services must be directly related to the services or treatment plan administered in the physical plant. This bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare medications, by performing specified functions, for administration only to inpatients within its own general acute care hospital and one or more general acute care hospitals if the hospitals are under common ownership, as defined, and within a 75-mile radius of each other. The bill would require a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to obtain a specialty license from the board, and the bill would make these licenses subject to annual renewal. The bill would condition both the issuance and renewal of a specialty license on a board inspection of the centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to ensure that the pharmacy is in compliance with the bill's provisions and regulations established by the board. The bill would impose specified issuance and annual renewal fees for a specialty license, and because these fees would be deposited into the Pharmacy Board Contingent Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare and store a limited quantity of specified unit dose drugs in advance of receipt of a patient-specific prescription in a specified quantity. The bill would impose various requirements on centralized hospital packaging pharmacies, including, but not limited to, that medications be barcoded to be readable at the inpatient's bedside and that medication labels contain specified information. The bill would make these pharmacies and pharmacists responsible for the integrity, potency, quality, and labeled strength of any unit dose drug product prepared by the packaging pharmacy. Because a knowing violation of these provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2012 · Assembly Aug 31, 2012
How they voted
24–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2012
D
Democratic20
80% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
11
Committee
15
Amendments
1
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-9-2)
assembly
Aug 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-0-7)
senate
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 9. Page 6696.).
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (August 30).
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 377
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 377. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline