Restitution: asset seizures: fraud and embezzlement.
Summary
Existing law provides for enhanced penalties in the case of a person who commits 2 or more related felonies, a material element of which is fraud or embezzlement, which involve a pattern of related felony conduct, and the pattern of related felony conduct involves the taking or loss of more than $100,000, and further provides that assets or property may be preserved by the court, as specified, in order to pay restitution and fines imposed in connection with those enhanced penalties. This bill would, in addition, provide for the preservation of assets and property by the court in order to pay all restitution and fines, and would apply those preservation of assets provisions in the case of a person who commits a single felony, a material element of which is fraud or embezzlement, if that conduct involves the taking or loss of more than $100,000. By expanding the scope of restitution provisions for crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Aug 5, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2011 · Assembly May 2, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jul 11, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Aug 5, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 11, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jul 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-5)
assembly
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 364
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 364. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline