AB 353 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Vehicles: checkpoints.

Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors of a county to establish, by ordinance, a combined vehicle inspection and sobriety checkpoint program to check for violations of motor vehicle exhaust standards and driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offenses. Existing law authorizes a peace officer, whenever the peace officer determines, among other things, that a person was driving a vehicle without ever having been issued a driver's license, to immediately arrest that person and cause the removal and seizure of his or her vehicle for an impoundment period of 30 days, or, if the person is currently without a valid driver's license, to remove the vehicle for a shorter period of time upon issuance of a notice to appear if the registered owner or the registered owner's agent presents a currently valid driver's license and proof of current vehicle registration, or upon order of the court. This bill would require the driver of a motor vehicle to stop and submit to a sobriety checkpoint inspection conducted by a law enforcement agency when signs and displays are posted requiring that stop. The bill would, notwithstanding other provisions of law, require that a peace officer or any other authorized person not cause the impoundment of a vehicle at a sobriety checkpoint, established pursuant to these provisions or any other law, if the driver's only offense is, among other offenses, the failure to hold a valid driver's license. The bill would require, during the conduct of a sobriety checkpoint, a law enforcement officer to make a reasonable attempt to identify the registered owner of the vehicle in order to release the vehicle to the registered owner if he or she is a licensed driver or to a licensed driver authorized by the registered owner. The bill would require that if a notice to appear is issued, the name and driver's license number of the licensed driver to whom the vehicle was released be listed on the officer's copy of the notice to appear issued to the unlicensed driver and would require if a vehicle cannot be released, that the vehicle be removed, as specified. (2) Existing law authorizes a peace officer to either immediately arrest a person and cause the removal and seizure of the vehicle he or she was operating or, if the vehicle is involved in a traffic collision, cause the removal and seizure of the vehicle, without the necessity of arresting the person, if the peace officer determines that the person was driving the vehicle while his or her driving privilege was suspended or revoked or without having been issued a license. Existing law subjects a vehicle to forfeiture as a nuisance if it is driven on a highway by a driver with a suspended or revoked license, or by an unlicensed driver, as specified. Existing law requires a vehicle to be impounded for at least 30 days if its driver is unable to produce a valid driver's license, except as specified. The bill would require a vehicle removed pursuant to the provisions of the bill to be released to the registered owner of the vehicle, or the registered owner's agent, as specified, upon a showing of proof of a currently valid driver's license and vehicle registration. Because this bill would expand the duties of local law enforcement officials and the scope of an existing DUI checkpoint program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Because the failure to comply with these provisions would constitute an infraction under the Vehicle Code, the bill would also impose a state-mandated local program, by creating a new crime. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 10, 2011 Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly Jun 2, 2011

How they voted

245
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2011
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
5 Yea 5 Nay 1
45% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 12. Page 2832.).
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-5-2)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-7-16)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
GC
Gilbert Cedillo
DDemocratic
CA
45