Elder abuse.
Summary
Existing law provides that any person who is not a caretaker of an elder or dependent adult, who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, or any person who is a caretaker of an elder or dependent adult, and that person violates specified identity theft provisions of law, with respect to the property or personal identifying information of an elder or a dependent adult, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in a state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value exceeding $950. This bill would make those offenses punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine or imprisonment, or alternatively by a fine not exceeding $10,000, or by imprisonment in a state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, or by both that fine and imprisonment, if the value of the assets taken is of a value exceeding $950. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 368 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 109, to be operative if both bills are enacted and became operative as specified. This bill would additionally incorporate changes to Section 368 of the Penal code proposed by SB 586, to be operative if both bills are enacted and became operative, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 10, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2011 · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2851.).
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
May 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGING & L.T.C. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Betsy Butler
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 332
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 332. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline