Forensic evidence: rape kits.
Summary
Existing law, the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights, authorizes a law enforcement agency investigating certain felony sex offenses, upon the request of the victim, and subject to the commitment of resources, to inform the victim whether or not a DNA profile was obtained from the testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence from the case, whether or not that information has been entered into the Department of Justice Data Bank of case evidence, and whether or not there is a match between the DNA profile developed from the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence and a DNA profile contained in the Department of Justice Convicted Offender DNA Data Base, as specified. Existing law also requires that the victim be given written notification by the law enforcement agency if the law enforcement agency elects not to perform DNA testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence, or intends to destroy or dispose of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, as specified. The bill would establish a pilot program in 10 counties, commencing July 1, 2012, in which all rape kits collected in those counties after that date will be processed by the Department of Justice in department laboratories. The pilot program would be operative until July 1, 2015, or the date when all rape kits collected in the counties participating in the pilot project, during the period of July 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014, are counted, whichever comes first. The department would be required to test every rape kit collected by a pilot project county during the period of the pilot project. The bill would provide that these provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2016. By imposing additional burdens on local law enforcement entities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Vetoed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
36–2
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Sep 6, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 10. Page 2979.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-2-1)
senate
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-13-6)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 322
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 322. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline