Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): determination: dispute.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, which includes a local agency, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires a lead agency to file a notice of approval or a notice of determination containing specified information with the Office of Planning Research or the county clerk of each county in which the project is located, as appropriate. CEQA provides a procedure by which a party may attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency on specified grounds and requires that a petitioner or plaintiff name, as a real party in interest, a recipient of an approval that is the subject of an action or proceeding challenging the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency pursuant to CEQA. This bill would require a notice of approval or notice of determination to identify the person undertaking an activity that receives financial assistance from a public agency or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from a public agency. Because a lead agency would be required to include additional information in the notice of approval or notice of determination, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a petitioner or plaintiff to name, as a real party in interest, the person identified by the public agency in its notice of determination or notice of exemption, as reflected by the agency's record of proceedings. The bill would provide that the above requirement would not apply to a proceeding for judicial review filed pursuant to CEQA that is pending on or before December 31, 2011, or to actions or proceedings challenging an act or decision of a public agency for which a notice of decision or notice of exemption was filed on or before December 31, 2011. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 12, 2011
How they voted
40–25
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 70
May 12, 2011
D
Democratic44
90% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 28. Page 2930.).
lower
Sep 1, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
May 12, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-25-5)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 5).
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 320
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 320. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline