Mobilehomes.
Summary
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs tenancies in mobilehome parks, and imposes various duties on the owners of mobilehome parks and the agents and representatives authorized to act on behalf of the owners. Existing law exempts a rental agreement from any local ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative that establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent if a mobilehome space within a mobilehome park is not the principal residence, as defined, of the mobilehome owner. Existing law requires the management of a mobilehome park to give a prospective homeowner a document containing specified information within 2 business days of receiving a request from the prospective homeowner for an application for residency in the mobilehome park if the management has been advised that the mobilehome occupying the requested space is for sale. Under existing law, the management must also provide a copy of the rules and regulations of the park at the prospective homeowner's request. The bill would revise the above-described document to include language advising prospective homeowners that if they do not occupy the mobilehome as their principal residence, those homeowners may be no longer subject to any local ordinances, rules, regulations, or initiative measures limiting or restricting rent in mobilehome parks.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Signed Sep 17, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2012 · Assembly Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 21, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Sep 17, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 63. Noes 4. Page 6233.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 21, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-20-12)
assembly
Jan 11, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (January 11).
lower
Jan 10, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
May 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
May 2, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 317
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 317. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline