Residential care facilities for the elderly.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, provides for the licensure of residential care facilities for the elderly by the State Department of Social Services. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the department to notify affected placement agencies and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, as defined, whenever the department substantiates that a violation has occurred that poses a serious threat to the health and safety of any resident when the violation results in the assessment of any penalty or causes an accusation to be filed for the revocation of a license. This bill would require a licensed residential care facility for the elderly to provide a prescribed written notice to a resident, the resident's responsible party, if any, and the local long-term care ombudsman under specified conditions. The bill would prescribe civil penalties for violation of specified provisions. (2) Existing law requires a licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely as a result of the forfeiture of a license or the change of use of the facility pursuant to the department's regulations. This bill would require the licensee to take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely as the result of the revocation of the license. (3) By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2011 · Assembly Apr 14, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2551.).
lower
Aug 22, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 22, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-0-18)
assembly
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 313
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline