Civil rights: homeless persons.
Summary
Existing law sets forth various personal rights and provides that all persons within California have the right to be free from violence, or intimidation by the threat of violence, because of, among other characteristics, their race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, or sex. Existing law further permits an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of specified personal rights has been interfered with to bring a civil action for damages, including actual damages, exemplary damages, attorney's fees, injunctive relief, and other appropriate relief. Existing law requires the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to receive, investigate, and conciliate complaints that an individual's personal rights have been violated. This bill would specify that homeless persons, as defined, are entitled to the personal rights set forth under existing law, and would provide that a homeless person has the right to be free from violence or intimidation by threat of violence directed against that person on the basis of that person's status as a homeless person. The bill would also provide that these provisions shall not be construed to enlarge or diminish an existing duty, if any, by an owner of residential rental or commercial property to protect a homeless person who is present on the property from violence or intimidation by threats of violence. The bill would provide that these provisions are not to be construed to prohibit or restrict a public agency from the lawful enforcement of any law, and a public agency would not be subject to civil liability for that lawful enforcement.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Vetoed
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Vetoed Aug 5, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 16, 2011
How they voted
43–23
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
May 16, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 5, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Jul 14, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 16, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-4)
assembly
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 22).
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 312
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 312. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline