Safe Body Art Act.
Summary
Under existing law, every person engaged in the business of tattooing, body piercing, or permanent cosmetics is required to register with the county in which that business is conducted, obtain a copy of the county's sterilization, sanitation, and safety standards, as established by the California Conference of Local Health Officers and distributed by the State Department of Public Health, as specified, and pay a one-time registration fee of $25. Existing law allows the county to charge an additional fee, if necessary to cover the cost of registration and inspection, and allows a county to adopt regulations that do not conflict with, or are more comprehensive than, standards adopted by the department. Under existing law, a person who fails to register or who violates the sterilization, sanitation, and safety standards is liable for a civil penalty of up to $500, to be collected in an action brought by the prosecuting attorney of the county or city and county in which the violation occurred. This bill would, as of July 1, 2012, repeal these provisions and, instead, enact the Safe Body Art Act. The act would prohibit a person from performing body art, as defined, without registering annually with the local enforcement agency. The bill would require practitioners to comply with specified requirements, including, among other things, client information and questionnaires, vaccination, bloodborne pathogen training, and sanitation. The bill would also require the owner of a body art facility, as defined, to obtain and annually renew a health permit from the local enforcement agency, as specified, and to maintain the body art facility in a specified manner. This bill would exempt from the definition of body art the piercing of an ear with a disposable, single-use, presterilized stud or solid needle that is applied using a mechanical device to force the needle or stud through the ear, but would impose specified requirements on that practice. The bill would authorize a local enforcement agency to require facilities performing ear piercing in that jurisdiction to submit a notification form, as provided, with the local enforcement agency. The bill would authorize the local enforcement agency to charge a one-time facility notification fee in an amount between $25 and $45, but not in excess of the amount required to cover the actual costs of administering and enforcing the program. The bill would authorize a county, after December 31, 2015, to charge a different fee, established by local ordinance, so long as an increased fee amount is necessary to cover the actual costs of administering and enforcing the provisions. This bill would regulate the performance of body art in vehicles, temporary booths, and at body art events. The bill would require a person sponsoring a body art event to obtain a permit and fulfill specified requirements and would authorize a local enforcement agency to establish reasonable regulatory fees, including, but not limited to, a fee for body art events in an amount not to exceed, but sufficient to cover, the costs of enforcement. The bill would authorize specified inspection by an enforcement officer, and would provide for the suspension or revocation of a certificate of registration or a health permit in specified circumstances. The bill would make performing body art without being registered, operation of a body art facility without a health permit, or operation of a temporary body art event without a permit a misdemeanor and would authorize the local enforcement agency to assess an administrative penalty, in an amount not less than $25 and not more than $1,000, for violating a provision of the bill. The bill would also authorize the local enforcement agency, in addition to these penalties, to impose a penalty of up to three times the cost of the registration or permit on a practitioner, owner of a body art facility, or sponsor of a temporary body art event who fails to obtain needed permits. This bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt regulations or ordinances that do not conflict with, or are more stringent than, the provisions of the bill as those provisions relate to body art. Because this bill would place the inspection and enforcement requirements on local governments and because it creates a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 9, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly Apr 11, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 71. Noes 3. Page 2831.).
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 30, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jun 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 8).
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and PUB. S.
upper
Apr 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-6)
assembly
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 300
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 300. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline