Mortgages and deeds of trust: foreclosure.
Summary
(1) Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law requires a notice of default or, in certain circumstances, a notice of sale, to include a declaration stating that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has contacted the borrower, or has tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or that no contact was required for a specified reason. This bill would add mortgage servicers, as defined, to these provisions and would extend the operation of these provisions indefinitely, except that it would delete the requirement with respect to a notice of sale. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, additionally require the borrower, as defined, to be provided with specified information in writing prior to recordation of a notice of default and, in certain circumstances, within 5 business days after recordation. The bill would prohibit a mortgage servicer, mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from recording a notice of default or, until January 1, 2018, recording a notice of sale or conducting a trustee's sale while a complete first lien loan modification application is pending, under specified conditions. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, establish additional procedures to be followed regarding a first lien loan modification application, the denial of an application, and a borrower's right to appeal a denial. (2) Existing law imposes various requirements that must be satisfied prior to exercising a power of sale under a mortgage or deed of trust, including, among other things, recording a notice of default and a notice of sale. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, require a written notice to the borrower after the postponement of a foreclosure sale in order to advise the borrower of any new sale date and time, as specified. The bill would provide that an entity shall not record a notice of default or otherwise initiate the foreclosure process unless it is the holder of the beneficial interest under the deed of trust, the original or substituted trustee, or the designated agent of the holder of the beneficial interest, as specified. The bill would prohibit recordation of a notice of default or a notice of sale or the conduct of a trustee's sale if a foreclosure prevention alternative has been approved and certain conditions exist and would, until January 1, 2018, require recordation of a rescission of those notices upon execution of a permanent foreclosure prevention alternative. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, prohibit the collection of application fees and the collection of late fees while a foreclosure prevention alternative is being considered, if certain criteria are met, and would require a subsequent mortgage servicer to honor any previously approved foreclosure prevention alternative. The bill would authorize a borrower to seek an injunction and damages for violations of certain of the provisions described above, except as specified. The bill would authorize the greater of treble actual damages or $50,000 in statutory damages if a violation of certain provisions is found to be intentional or reckless or resulted from willful misconduct, as specified. The bill would authorize the awarding of attorneys' fees for prevailing borrowers, as specified. Violations of these provisions by licensees of the Department of Corporations, the Department of Financial Institutions, and the Department of Real Estate would also be violations of those respective licensing laws. Because a violation of certain of those licensing laws is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that the requirements imposed on mortgage servicers, and mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries, and authorized agents, described above are applicable only to mortgages or deeds of trust secured by residential real property not exceeding 4 dwelling units that is owner-occupied, as defined, and, until January 1, 2018, only to those entities who conduct more than 175 foreclosure sales per year or annual reporting period, except as specified. The bill would require, upon request from a borrower who requests a foreclosure prevention alternative, a mortgage servicer who conducts more than 175 foreclosure sales per year or annual reporting period to establish a single point of contact and provide the borrower with one or more direct means of communication with the single point of contact. The bill would specify various responsibilities of the single point of contact. The bill would define single point of contact for these purposes. (3) Existing law prescribes documents that may be recorded or filed in court. This bill would require that a specified declaration, notice of default, notice of sale, deed of trust, assignment of a deed of trust, substitution of trustee, or declaration or affidavit filed in any court relative to a foreclosure proceeding or recorded by or on behalf of a mortgage servicer shall be accurate and complete and supported by competent and reliable evidence. The bill would require that before recording or filing any of those documents, a mortgage servicer shall ensure that it has reviewed competent and reliable evidence to substantiate the borrower's default and the right to foreclose, including the borrower's loan status and loan information. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, provide that any mortgage servicer that engages in multiple and repeated violations of these requirements shall be liable for a civil penalty of up to $7,500 per mortgage or deed of trust, in an action brought by specified state and local government entities, and would also authorize administrative enforcement against licensees of the Department of Corporations, the Department of Financial Institutions, and the Department of Real Estate. The bill would authorize the Department of Corporations, the Department of Financial Institutions, and the Department of Real Estate to adopt regulations applicable to persons and entities under their respective jurisdictions for purposes of the provisions described above. The bill would provide that a violation of those regulations would be enforceable only by the regulating agency. (4)   The bill would state findings and declarations of the Legislature in relation to foreclosures in the state generally, and would state the purposes of the bill. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 8, 2011
Signed Jul 11, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2012 · Assembly May 23, 2011
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jul 2, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
15
Committee
15
Amendments
2
Jul 11, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 2, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-1)
senate
Jul 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senate adopted Conference Committee report. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 4221.)
legislature
Jul 2, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Assembly adopts Conference Committee report. (Ayes 54. Noes 26. Page 5549.).
legislature
Jun 27, 2012
Legislature · Passed
From Conference Committee: Be adopted. Assembly (Ayes 2 (Eng and Feuer). Noes 1 (Wagner)). Senate (Ayes 2 (Evans and Calderon). Noes 0.)). To print.
legislature
May 2, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senators Evans, Calderon, and Blakeslee appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Apr 24, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senators Evans, Vargas, and Blakeslee appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Apr 23, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Assembly Members Eng, Feuer, and Wagner appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Apr 23, 2012
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. To Conference Committee. (Ayes 5. Noes 57. Page 4482.)
legislature
Apr 19, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after April 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 21).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 23, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Co
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Co
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
MD
Mike Davis
DDemocratic
Co
MF
Mike Feuer
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 278
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 278. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline