Satellite wagering.
Summary
Existing law requires that every person who participates in, or has anything to do with, the racing of horses and every employee of a parimutuel department be licensed by the California Horse Racing Board. Existing law requires the board to set forth requirements for the position of satellite facility supervisor for all satellite wagering facilities operated by the state or on public land. The supervisor is required to monitor the performance of licensees at the facilities. This bill would create an exception from that provision by authorizing a fair satellite facility generating less than $10,000,000 annually in total handle to elect not to be subject to the requirements related to a satellite facility supervisor if the board of directors of the fair satellite facility, after a public hearing, deems those requirements to be not economically feasible, under specified conditions. Those conditions would include a requirement that the fair board notify the California Horse Racing Board in writing of its intention to take that action 30 days prior to the public hearing, and that notice of the fair board's action be provided to the California Horse Racing Board within 10 days of approval by the fair board. The bill would require the fair satellite facility to continue to abide by all laws and regulations pertaining to the operation of a satellite facility, including the responsibilities of the position of satellite facility supervisor. The bill would also require that notice of the fair board's action include the name and contact information of the individual or individuals assuming the responsibilities of the satellite facility supervisor position.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 7, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Sep 8, 2011
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3127.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 14).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
Mar 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (March 30).
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 270
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 270. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline