Peace officers: Maritime Police Officer Standards Training Act of 2012.
Summary
Existing law establishes in the Department of Justice the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. Existing law requires the commission to adopt, and authorizes the commission to amend, rules establishing minimum standards relating to physical, mental, and moral fitness that govern the recruitment of various peace officers, including city police officers and peace officer members of a county sheriff's office. Existing law also requires the commission to carry out various duties related to peace officer education and training, including, among other duties, establishing a certificate program for peace officers, making inquiries to ensure adherence to standards for the recruitment and training of peace officers, and implementing specified courses of instruction in procedures applicable in specific circumstances, such as domestic violence and child abuse or neglect. Existing law authorizes the commission to adopt those regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of these provisions relating to peace officer standards and training. This bill would enact the Maritime Police Officer Standards Training Act of 2012. The bill would require, as a condition of receiving state aid related to peace officer training, every peace officer who is assigned to a jurisdiction that includes waterborne environments to complete a Peace Officer Standards and Training course in basic maritime law for law enforcement officers. The bill would require the course of instruction to include, among other things, boat handling, navigation rules, and comprehensive training regarding maritime boardings, arrest procedures, and counterterrorism practices and procedures. The bill would require that the curriculum be consistent with federal doctrine and current tactical training. The bill would require the commission to develop and implement a course or course of instruction for the training of law enforcement officers in basic maritime law for law enforcement officers consistent with these requirements, and to develop and adopt any regulations necessary to carry out these provisions. The bill would also require the commission to identify those jurisdictions in which these provisions would apply. The bill would provide that these provisions would become operative only when sufficient funding is made available, as specified.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action May 25, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
6
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2571
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2571. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline