Environmental quality: pipelines: project applicants.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA exempts a project of less than one mile in length within a public street or highway or any other public right-of-way for the installation of a new pipeline, as defined, or the maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, relocation, replacement, removal, or demolition of an existing pipeline. Existing law excludes from the definition of pipeline, for purposes of this exemption, certain surface facilities. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, revise that definition of pipeline to delete the exclusion of those surface facilities and to include surface accessories or appurtenances to a pipeline. The bill would require a resource agency, as defined, when determining the applicability of the exemption of pipelines from the act with regard to a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity, as defined, to consider only the length of pipeline that is within its legal jurisdiction. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the exemption of pipelines from the act and upon a local agency that is a resource agency regarding the applicability of the exemption regarding a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity. The bill would, until January 1, 2018, authorize a public agency to establish a process that would allow an applicant for a natural gas pipeline safety enhancement activity to elect to pay additional fees to be used by the public agency in determining whether to approve that activity by entering into a contract with one or more 3rd parties to assist the public agency to perform the analysis. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 23, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly Aug 23, 2012
How they voted
24–4
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
70% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
11
Committee
13
Amendments
4
Sep 23, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-4-3)
senate
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 2. Page 6779.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-8)
assembly
Aug 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 14, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2564
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2564. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline