Pupil discipline: suspensions and expulsions.
Summary
Existing law requires the principal of a school or the principal's designee to notify the appropriate law enforcement agencies of the county or city in which the school is situated of certain unlawful acts committed by a pupil that may result in suspension, expulsion, or criminal liability of the pupil, as specified. Existing law provides that a willful failure to make a report required by these provisions is an infraction punishable by a fine of not more that $500. This bill would delete the provision making a violation of that reporting requirement an infraction. Under existing law, the principal or the superintendent of schools is required to recommend the expulsion of a pupil for certain acts committed at school or at a school activity off school grounds, unless the principal or superintendent finds that expulsion is inappropriate, due to the particular circumstance. These acts include, among others, the unlawful possession of certain controlled substances, except for the first offense for the possession of marijuana, as specified. For these acts, the governing board of the school district is authorized, but not required, to order the expulsion of the pupil. This bill would instead require the principal or superintendent of schools to make that recommendation unless he or she determines that expulsion should not be recommended under the circumstances or that an alternative means of correction would address the conduct. The bill would encourage the principal or superintendent of schools to make that determination as quickly as possible to ensure that the pupil does not lose instructional time. The bill would include the act of possessing an over-the-counter medication or medication prescribed for the pupil by a physician as an additional exception to the act of possessing a controlled substance for purposes of the expulsion provisions described above. Under existing law, the principal or superintendent of schools is required to immediately suspend, and to recommend expulsion of, a pupil that he or she determines has committed certain acts at school or at a school activity off school grounds, including, among others, the possession of a firearm, and the governing board of the school district is required to order a pupil expelled upon the finding that the pupil did commit one of these acts. This bill would specify that the act of possessing an imitation firearm, as defined, is not an offense for which suspension or expulsion is mandatory, but is an offense for which suspension or expulsion may be imposed. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature that the acts enumerated in specified provisions form the exclusive bases for the imposition of suspension or expulsion.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 21, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 21, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 27. Page 6323.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-3)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-22-6)
assembly
May 15, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (May 9).
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
lower
Mar 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
VM
V. Manuel Pérez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2537
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2537. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline