Wage liens: laborers and car washing and polishing employees.
Summary
 (1) Existing law provides that specified persons, including laborers, as defined, who contribute labor, skill, or services to a work of improvement, shall have a mechanic's lien upon the property so improved. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2018, a car washing and polishing employee to record and enforce a wage lien upon specified real and personal property for wages and other compensation and related penalties and damages owed the employee. The bill would prescribe requirements relating to the recording and enforcement of the wage lien. (2) Existing law provides that a claimant other than a direct contractor may not enforce a lien unless the claimant records a claim of lien after he or she ceases to provide work, and before the earlier of (a) 90 days after completion of the work of improvement or (b)  30 days after the owner records a notice of completion or cessation. This bill would provide that a laborer may not enforce a lien unless he or she records a claim of lien after he or she ceases to furnish labor or services, and before the earlier of (a) one year after completion of the work of improvement or (b) 180 days after the owner records a notice of completion or cessation. (3) Existing law requires the court, in an action to enforce a mechanic's lien, to allow as costs, in addition to any other costs allowed by law, the amount paid to verify and record the claim of lien, as specified. This bill would provide that a laborer shall be entitled to the court costs and attorney's fees incurred as a result of recording and foreclosing on a mechanic's lien, and, upon award, these amounts shall be considered part of the lien and shall relate back to the date of recording of the lien.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
May 2012
Assembly Failed
May 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action May 31, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
29–27
Failed · 14 other
Total votes 70
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic44
65% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
3
Committee
8
Amendments
1
May 31, 2012
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (29-27-14)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2517
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2517. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline