Independent System Operator.
Summary
The existing restructuring of the electrical industry within the Public Utilities Act provides for the establishment of an Independent System Operator (ISO) as a nonprofit public benefit corporation. Existing law requires the ISO to manage the transmission grid and related energy markets in a manner that is consistent with (1) making the most efficient use of available energy resources, (2) reducing, to the extent possible, overall economic cost to the state's consumers, (3) applicable state law intended to protect the public's health and the environment, and (4) maximizing the availability of existing electric generation resources necessary to meet the needs of the state's electricity consumers. This bill would, in addition, require the ISO to manage the transmission grid and related energy markets in a manner that is consistent with (5) conducting internal operations in a manner that minimizes cost impact on ratepayers to the extent practicable and consistent with the provisions applicable to the operation of the ISO and (6) communicating with all balancing area authorities in California in a manner that supports electrical reliability. The Public Utilities Act provides that every corporation or person, other than a public utility and its officers, agents, and employees, that fails to comply with the act is guilty of a crime. Because the requirements of this bill are within the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the application of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Jul 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 28, 2012 · Assembly May 17, 2012
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Jun 28, 2012
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Jul 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Jun 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
May 17, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-7)
assembly
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 25).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2516
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2516. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline