Court security.
Summary
The Superior Court Law Enforcement Act of 2002 authorizes the presiding judge of each superior court to contract with a sheriff or marshal for the necessary level of law enforcement services in the courts. Existing law requires the sheriff or marshal and presiding judge of any county to develop a court security plan to be utilized by the court, as specified, and requires the Judicial Council to establish a process for its review of court security plans in the California Rules of Court. Existing law requires the superior court and the sheriff or marshal to enter into a memorandum of understanding specifying the agreed upon level of court security services and their cost and terms of payment, and requires the sheriff or marshal to provide specified information to the courts by April 30 of each year, with actual court security allocations subject to the approval of the Judicial Council and the funding provided by the Legislature. This bill would state that the court security services provided by the sheriff, as agreed upon by the superior court and the sheriff, may include, but shall not be limited to, among other things, performing bailiff functions, escorting prisoners to and from holding cells, and providing security in areas adjacent to a courthouse facility, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Aug 8, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 17, 2012
How they voted
66–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 72
May 17, 2012
D
Democratic45
91% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 17, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-6)
assembly
May 8, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2473
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2473. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline