Judicial Council: employer-employee relations.
Summary
The Ralph C. Dills Act, administered by the Public Employment Relations Board, authorizes state employees to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations, as specified. Existing law authorizes an employee organization to become the exclusive representative of an appropriate unit for purposes of meeting and negotiating, as specified. Existing law requires the Governor, or his or her representative, as properly designated by law, to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment with representatives of recognized employee organizations, and to consider fully any presentation that is made by an employee organization on behalf of its members prior to arriving at a determination of policy or course of action. This bill would provide that the Ralph C. Dills Act applies to employees of the Judicial Council, including employees of the Administrative Office of the Courts. The bill would require the Administrative Director of the Courts to meet and confer in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and would identify matters excluded from the scope of representation. The bill would require the Public Employment Relations Board, in determining appropriate bargaining units, to not include Judicial Council employees in a bargaining unit that includes other employees.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Jun 25, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 30, 2012
How they voted
45–24
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
May 30, 2012
D
Democratic45
100% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-24-3)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 16, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2381
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2381. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline