School districts: emergency apportionments: trustees.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to request an emergency apportionment through the Superintendent of Public Instruction if the governing board of the school district determines during a fiscal year that its revenues are less than the amount necessary to meet its current year expenditure obligations. Under existing law, if a school district accepts an emergency apportionment, the Superintendent is required, among other things, to appoint a trustee who has recognized expertise in management and finance, and may employ, on a short-term basis, any staff necessary to assist the trustee. Existing law also requires the trustee and any necessary staff to serve until the emergency apportionment is repaid, the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, and the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable. Existing law authorizes the trustee, during the period of his or her service, to stay or rescind any action of the governing board of the school district that, in the judgment of the trustee, may affect the financial condition of the school district. This bill would instead require the trustee and necessary staff to serve until the school district has adequate fiscal systems and controls in place, the Superintendent determines that the school district's future compliance with an approved fiscal plan is probable, and the Superintendent decides to terminate the trustee's appointment, but in no event, for less than 3 years. The bill would authorize the county superintendent of schools who has jurisdiction over the school district, after the trustee's period of service and until the loan is repaid, to stay or rescind an action of the governing board of the school district that, in his or her judgment, may affect the financial condition of the school district. The bill would require the county superintendent of schools to notify the Superintendent, as specified, within 5 business days of staying or rescinding an action of the governing board of the school district. If the Superintendent receives this notice from the county superintendent of schools, the bill would require the Superintendent to report to the Legislature, on or before December 30 of every year, whether the school district is complying with the fiscal plan approved for the school district. Existing law authorizes the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. This bill would instead authorize the Superintendent, within 5 years after an appointed trustee is removed or the emergency apportionment is repaid, whichever occurs later, to reassume, either directly or through an administrator, all of the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the school district if the school district violates any provision of specified recovery plans approved by the Superintendent. The bill also would authorize the governing board of a qualifying school district, after one complete fiscal year has elapsed following the qualifying school district's acceptance of an emergency apportionment, to conduct an annual advisory evaluation, as specified, of the administrator appointed by the Superintendent. The bill would require the evaluation criteria to be agreed upon by the governing board of the qualifying school district and the administrator. The bill would require the advisory evaluation of the administrator to be submitted to the Governor, the Legislature, the Superintendent, and the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team. The bill would make numerous nonsubstantive changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 41326 of the Education Code, proposed by AB 2662, to be operative only if AB 2662 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 21, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
20–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 21, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 1. Page 6415.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-9-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 20).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 3, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 25).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 15, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2279
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2279. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline