Education technology planning.
Summary
Existing law requires that, as a precondition to receiving a technology grant administered by the State Department of Education, a school district shall have a current 3- to 5-year education technology plan, unless this requirement is waived by the State Board of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop guidelines and criteria for inclusion in the education technology plan, including a component to educate pupils and teachers on specified topics. This bill would expand that list of topics to include the prevention of, and legal consequences for, cyberbullying, the active use of content control software, and the responsible use by pupils of mobile communication technology. The bill would exempt from compliance with this requirement a school district that, on July 1, 2012, has a 3- to 5-year education technology plan until that plan expires or is voluntarily replaced, at which time the school district would be subject to the requirement. The bill would also require that the additional topics of the prevention of, and legal consequences for, cyberbullying, the active use of content control software, and the responsible use by pupils of mobile communication technology, be implemented only to the extent that state or federal funds are appropriated for those topics. The bill would make other conforming changes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 25, 2011
How they voted
45–19
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 69
Apr 25, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican25
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-19-5)
assembly
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 30).
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 227
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 227. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline