Improvement districts.
Summary
The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 and the Multifamily Improvement District Law both require a management district plan for an improvement district proposed under either law to include specified information. Both laws require a city council to contract with a nonprofit corporation if the management district plan designates the nonprofit corporation to provide services to the improvement district. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 sets forth the procedures for establishing an assessment district under the act, including the preparation of reports by an engineer. This bill would prohibit the city council, the owners' association, and the nonprofit corporation, if one is designated, in the case of a district formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 or the Multifamily Improvement District Law, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district. The bill would also prohibit a local agency, in the case of an assessment district formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, from contracting for services relating to the management or operation of the district with any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or other organization that was previously contracted with for services relating to the formation of the district.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Jun 25, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
35–30
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 72
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic45
73% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-30-7)
assembly
May 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (May 9).
lower
Mar 15, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2265
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2265. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline