Infrastructure financing districts: America's Cup and waterfront district venues.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, including districts that include specified waterfront property, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. With respect to the infrastructure financing district provisions that apply to the City and County of San Francisco and waterfront districts, this bill would modify the definition of key terms and authorize a waterfront district to finance improvements to protect against potential sea level rise. The bill would modify provisions relating to the ordinance establishing the base year for the district and would specify the base year of land annexed into a district. In the event the district requests an affected tax entity to subordinate the amount to be paid to the entity, the bill would authorize the affected taxing entity to disapprove a request for subordination only if there will be insufficient tax increment funds. Existing law authorizes the adoption of infrastructure financing plans for special waterfront districts that include the waterfront area in the City and County of San Francisco designated as the America's Cup venues, and the use of specified tax revenues produced in the districts for the construction of the Port of San Francisco's maritime facilities at Pier 27, improvement of publicly held waterfront lands used as viewing sites, and other matters, subject to specified allocation procedures. Existing law requires that, with respect to the special waterfront district Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) share produced in a Port America's Cup district with a special waterfront district enhanced financing, 20% of that amount be set aside to finance costs of specified improvements to federally or state-owned waterfront lands approved by trustee agencies. The bill would provide that the ERAF share of set-aside funds be used to finance costs of planning, design, and acquisition and construction of improvements to publicly owned waterfront lands owned by federal, state, or San Francisco local department trustee agencies. The bill would impose new requirements and grant certain exceptions in the event any portion of the set-aside funds is allocated to a federal or state trustee agency. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a waterfront district to, by resolution, authorize the issuance of bonds without holding an election of the voters residing in the waterfront district. The bill would additionally authorize the legislative body of a waterfront district to undertake proceedings and actions relating to infrastructure financing districts with respect to the district as a whole or separately with respect to one or more project areas. The bill would authorize the legislative body to increase the principal amount of bonds that may be issued for a district or project area within a district. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations to ratify any action taken by San Francisco consistent with the special statute prior to its effective date.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 30, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6414.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2259
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2259. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline