Pupils: grounds for suspension and expulsion.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the suspension, or recommendation for expulsion, of a pupil from school unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school determines that the pupil has committed any of various specified acts. Existing law also authorizes the assignment of a pupil suspended from a school to a supervised suspension classroom under certain conditions. Under existing law, the acts for which a pupil may be suspended or recommended for expulsion include, but are not limited to, disrupting school activities or otherwise willfully defying the valid authority of supervisors, teachers, administrators, school officials, or other school personnel engaged in the performance of their duties. These acts also include, for a pupil enrolled in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, intentionally engaging in harassment, threats, or intimidation, directed against school district personnel or pupils, that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to have the actual and reasonably expected effect of materially disrupting classwork, creating substantial disorder, and invading the rights of either school personnel or pupils by creating an intimidating or hostile educational environment. This bill would provide that, if the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which a pupil is enrolled determines that a pupil has disrupted school activities or otherwise willfully defied the valid authority of supervisors, teachers, administrators, school officials, or other school personnel engaged in the performance of their duties, the pupil may be subject to other means of correction, community service during nonschool hours, or in-school suspension in a supervised suspension classroom, but not to an extended suspension, recommendation for expulsion, or expulsion. The bill would move the language relating to a pupil enrolled in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, intentionally engaging in harassment, threats, or intimidation, directed against school district personnel or pupils, to another code section in place of the language relating to a pupil disrupting school activities or otherwise willfully defying valid authority. The bill would also make conforming and nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 48900 of the Education Code proposed by AB 1729 that would become operative if this bill and AB 1729 are enacted, and this bill is enacted last. This bill would also incorporate changes to that section proposed by AB 1732, which has been chaptered.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Vetoed Sep 21, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 13, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 13, 2012
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 21, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 21, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 6651.).
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-3)
senate
Jul 3, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-23-8)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2242
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2242. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline