School accountability: Academic Performance Index.
Summary
The Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) , which measures the performance of schools and the academic performance of pupils and consists of a variety of indicators, including pupil scores from a list of specified tests. The results of those specified tests constitute 60% of the value of the API. This bill, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, would require the Superintendent, in consultation with the State Board of Education, to incorporate various indicators into the API, including high school graduation rates, rates by which pupils complete a course of study at an achievement level that fulfills the requirements and prerequisites for admission to California public institutions of postsecondary education, and rates by which pupils complete a course of study that provides the skills and knowledge necessary to attain entry-level employment in business or industry when they graduate from high school. Existing law requires the Superintendent to establish an advisory committee to advise the Superintendent and the state board on the creation of the API and to make related recommendations. This bill would require the advisory committee to make recommendations relative to implementing the requirements imposed by this bill. The advisory committee also would be required to develop recommendations for the inclusion of multiple measures in the API of middle and junior high schools.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
44–22
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-22-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 30).
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 224
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 224. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline