Sidewalks: repairs.
Summary
Existing law requires the owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any portion of a public street or place to maintain any sidewalk in such condition that the sidewalk will not endanger persons or property and maintain it in a condition that will not interfere with the public convenience in the use of those works or areas, except as to those conditions created or maintained by persons other than the owner. Existing law requires the superintendent of streets, as defined, to provide specified notice to the owner or person in possession of the property fronting on that portion of the sidewalk so out of repair or pending reconstruction, to repair the sidewalk. Under existing law, if the repair is not commenced within 2 weeks after the notice has been provided, the superintendent of streets shall make the repair and the cost of the repair shall be imposed as a lien on the property. This bill would provide that if a city, county, or city and county has an ordinance in place that requires that local entity to repair sidewalks, a repeal of that ordinance shall become effective only if the repealing ordinance is approved by the majority of voters voting on that measure in a consolidated or general election. The bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county that has an ordinance in place that requires that local entity to repair sidewalks, from imposing a fee, charge, or assessment, except a voluntary contractual assessment, for sidewalk repairs against an owner of private property fronting on any portion of a sidewalk, unless a repeal of that local entity's sidewalk repair ordinance is approved by the voters, as specified. The bill would make these provisions applicable to charter cities and counties. By imposing new duties on cities, counties, and cities and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Last action Aug 16, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 25, 2012
How they voted
44–8
Passed · 20 other
Total votes 72
Jun 25, 2012
D
Democratic45
48% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
5
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-8-20)
assembly
Jun 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 20).
lower
May 31, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2231
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2231. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline