Human trafficking: civil penalties.
Summary
Under existing law, a person who deprives or violates the personal liberty of another with the intent to effect or maintain a felony violation of specified sexual crimes, such as rape or pandering, or to obtain forced labor or services, is guilty of human trafficking, which is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 3, 4, or 5 years. Existing law classifies a building or place used for the purpose of illegal gambling, lewdness, assignation, or prostitution, and every building or place in or upon which acts of illegal gambling, lewdness, assignation, or prostitution, are held or occur, as a nuisance, which shall be enjoined, abated, and prevented, and for which damages may be recovered through a prescribed process. Civil penalties recovered through this process are divided between the Restitution Fund in the State Treasury and either the city attorney and city prosecutor or the district attorney, depending on who brought the action. This bill would classify a building or place used for the purpose of, or in or upon which are held or occur acts of, human trafficking as a public nuisance. The bill would divide civil penalties collected through the nuisance provisions, in cases of human trafficking, between the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund, to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature to the California Emergency Management Agency to fund grants for human trafficking victim services and prevention programs, and the city attorney and city prosecutor or district attorney. Existing law authorizes a court to award costs, including the costs of investigation and discovery, and reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in cases in which a governmental agency seeks to enjoin the use of a building or place for, or to enjoin acts of, illegal gambling, lewdness, assignation, or prostitution. The bill would make that provision applicable to cases in which a governmental agency seeks to enjoin the use of a building or place for, or to enjoin acts of, human trafficking.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jul 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 7, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2012 · Assembly Aug 13, 2012
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Jul 2, 2012
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 7, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-4)
assembly
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5908.).
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Jul 2, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17).
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2212
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2212. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline