Employment: credit reports.
Summary
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions. Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Existing federal law provides that, subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not procure a report or cause one to be procured for employment purposes, unless prior disclosure of the procurement is made to the consumer and the consumer authorizes the procurement, as specified. Existing federal law further requires, subject to certain exceptions, an employer, before taking any adverse action based on the report, to provide the consumer with a copy of the report and a written description of certain rights of the consumer. Under existing state law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides prior written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing state law also requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report is sought that a report will be used and of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing state law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an adverse action was taken based upon information contained in the report and provide the person with the name and address of the consumer credit agency making the report. A consumer who suffers damages resulting from a violation of these state law provisions may bring a court action to recover monetary damages, as specified, but no person is liable for the violation if he or she shows reasonable procedures were maintained to assure compliance with the provisions, as specified. This bill would prohibit an employer or prospective employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from obtaining a consumer credit report, as defined, for employment purposes unless the position of the person for whom the report is sought is (1) a position in the state Department of Justice, (2) a managerial position, as defined, (3) that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement position, (4) a position for which the information contained in the report is required by law to be disclosed or obtained, (5) a position that involves regular access to specified personal information for any purpose other than the routine solicitation and processing of credit card applications in a retail establishment, (6) a position in which the person is or would be a named signatory on the employer's bank or credit card account, or authorized to transfer money or enter into financial contracts on the employer's behalf, (7) a position that involves access to confidential or proprietary information, as specified, or (8) a position that involves regular access to $10,000 or more of cash, as specified. This bill would also require the written notice informing the person for whom a consumer credit report is sought for employment purposes to also inform the person of the specific reason for obtaining the report, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
37–27
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic44
84% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 3124.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (August 15).
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-27-6)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. & E.
lower
Dec 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
MD
Mike Davis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 22
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 22. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline