Fish and game: enforcement and penalties.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Fish and Game Commission, or any person appointed by the commission, to conduct a hearing, to cause the deposition of witnesses, as prescribed, and to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and papers, in accordance with certain requirements. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, eliminate the prohibition that the commission not revoke or suspend any license or permit until specified regulations have been adopted and approved, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, also eliminate the provision that any deliberation conducted by the commission, or conducted by any person appointed by the commission to conduct a hearing, is required to be conducted pursuant to the law governing administrative adjudication. Existing law requires the commission to adopt guidelines, by regulation, to assist the director and the department in ascertaining the amount of specified civil penalties, as prescribed. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. Existing law permits the Department of Fish and Game to impose civil liability upon any person for specified acts, with prescribed exceptions, done for profit or personal gain, for unlawfully exporting, importing, possessing, receiving, or transporting in interstate commerce any container or package containing any bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or any endangered or threatened species, or any fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unless the container is marked as prescribed, and for any unlawful failure or refusal to maintain any records or paperwork as required. Under existing law, the department may assess a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish, or for each endangered or threatened species, or each fully protected bird, mammal, or fish unlawfully taken, possessed, transported, imported, received, purchased, acquired, or sold, in addition to any other applicable penalty. Existing law also requires the department to consult with the district attorney in the jurisdiction where a violation is alleged to have occurred and, before proceeding with a civil action, to seek the concurrence of the Attorney General, as described. Existing law permits the Director of Fish and Game to issue a complaint to any person on whom a civil penalty may be imposed, in accordance with specified provisions, and requires a referee or hearing board, as provided for, to conduct any required hearing. This bill would make these provisions inoperative until January 1, 2018. This bill would instead permit the department to impose administrative civil penalties, determined as prescribed, upon any person who has violated any provision of the Fish and Game Code or regulations adopted pursuant to the code that are subject to prescribed civil penalties. This bill would require the department to adopt regulations to provide guidance in assessing these civil penalties. This bill would require, prior to the imposition of administrative penalties, a person to be given a written notice of the proposed action. This bill would require a person who receives notice of a proposed penalty to have the right to request a hearing before the department in accordance with specified procedures. This bill would permit the department to take the action proposed without a hearing if a hearing is not requested. This bill would permit a person to appeal to the director if administrative penalties are imposed upon that person, as prescribed. This bill would permit a person served with a copy of an order setting the amount of a civil penalty to file with the superior court a petition for a writ of mandate for review of the order, as specified. This bill would permit the department to file a certified copy of the final decision that directs payment of an administrative penalty and, if applicable, any order that denies a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus with the clerk of the superior court of any county, would require the clerk to enter judgment, and would prohibit the clerk from charging fees for the performance of any official service required in connection with this entry of judgment. This bill would require any administrative penalties received pursuant to these provisions to be deposited into the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. This bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2018. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires any public record of a state or local agency to be open to inspection at all times during office hours of the agency and, upon request, a copy be made promptly available to any person upon payment of copying costs. The act makes certain records exempt from disclosure. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, and after all appeals are final, provide that records of the appeal to the director are public records, as defined by the act.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Aug 31, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly May 30, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (34-27-9)
assembly
May 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2179
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2179. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline