Elder and dependent adult abuse: settlement: gag order.
Summary
The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act proscribes crimes against elder and dependent adults involving physical and financial abuse. The act provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs, and damages to a plaintiff, when it is proven that a defendant is liable for physical abuse, neglect, or financial abuse, and the defendant has also been guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice in the commission of the abuse. The Civil Discovery Act provides that it is the policy of the state that confidential settlement agreements are disfavored in any civil action the factual foundation for which establishes a cause of action for violation of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act. The Civil Discovery Act prohibits the court from recognizing or enforcing provisions of such a confidential settlement agreement in the absence of specified conditions. This bill would provide that an agreement, entered on or after January 1, 2013, to settle a civil action for physical abuse, neglect, or financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult shall not include any provision that, among other things, prohibits contact or cooperation with the county adult protective services agency, the local law enforcement agency, the long-term care ombudsman, the California Department of Aging, the Department of Justice, or the Licensing and Certification Division of the State Department of Public Health, the State Department of Developmental Services, the State Department of State Hospitals, a licensing or regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over the license or certification of the defendant, any other governmental entity, a protection and advocacy agency, as defined, or the defendant's current employer if the defendant's job responsibilities include contact with elders, dependent adults, or children, as specified. The bill would provide that any such provision is void as against public policy.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly May 25, 2012
How they voted
21–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6314.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-7-3)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 25, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-23-10)
assembly
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (May 1).
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 24).
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Betsy Butler
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2149
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2149. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline