AB 2144 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Local government: infrastructure and revitalization financing districts.

Summary
Existing law authorizes the creation of infrastructure financing districts, as defined, for the sole purpose of financing public facilities, subject to adoption of a resolution by the legislative body and affected taxing entities proposed to be subject to division of taxes and 23 voter approval. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to, by majority vote, initiate proceedings to issue bonds for the financing of district projects by adopting a resolution, subject to specified procedures and 23 voter approval. Existing law requires an infrastructure financing plan to include the date on which an infrastructure financing district will cease to exist, which may not be more than 30 years from the date on which the ordinance forming the district is adopted. Existing law prohibits a district from including any portion of a redevelopment project area. Existing law, the Polanco Redevelopment Act, authorizes a redevelopment agency to take any action that the agency determines is necessary and consistent with state and federal laws to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property within a project area, whether the agency owns that property or not, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also declares the intent of the Legislature that the areas of the district created be substantially undeveloped, and that the establishment of a district should not ordinarily lead to the removal of dwelling units. This bill would authorize the creation of an infrastructure and revitalization financing district, as defined, and the issuance of debt with 55% voter approval. The bill would authorize the creation of a district for up to 40 years and the issuance of debt with a final maturity date of up to 30 years, as specified. The bill would authorize a district to finance projects in redevelopment project areas and former redevelopment project areas and former military bases. The bill would authorize the legislative body of a city to dedicate any portion of its funds received from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to the district, if specified criteria are met. The bill would authorize a city to form a district to finance a project or projects on a former military base, if specified conditions are met. The bill would provide that the formation of the district and the issuance of debt by such a district on land of a former military base that is publicly owned is not subject to voter approval, as specified. The bill would authorize a district to fund various projects, including, among others, watershed land used for the collection and treatment of water for urban uses, flood management, levees, bypasses, open space, habitat restoration, brownfields restoration, environmental mitigation, purchase of land and property for development purposes, including commercial property, hazardous cleanup, former military bases, and specified transportation purposes. The bill would authorize a district to implement hazardous cleanup pursuant to the Polanco Redevelopment Act, as specified. The bill would impose a specified reporting requirement on districts. The bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature that the establishment of a district should not ordinarily lead to the removal of existing functional, habitable, and safe dwelling units, as specified. The bill would define the term "public works" for purposes of these provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012 Vetoed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 21, 2012

How they voted

229
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2012
D Democratic23
22 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican12
9 Nay 3
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 29, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 27. Page 6358.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-9-4)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 28).
upper
May 31, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 21, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-24-5)
assembly
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.