Health insurance fraud: annual fee.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires a disability insurer or other entity liable for any loss due to health insurance fraud doing business in California to pay an annual fee that does not exceed $0.10 per year for each insured in order to fund increased investigation and prosecution of fraudulent disability insurance claims. Existing law requires that 50% of those funds be distributed to the Fraud Division of the Department of Insurance for enhanced investigative efforts and that the other 50% be distributed to local district attorneys for the investigation and prosecution of disability insurance fraud cases, as specified. This bill would authorize the commissioner to increase the fee to no more than $0.20 per year for each insured and would require that 30% of those funds go to the Fraud Division of the department and that 70% go to the local district attorneys. The bill would require the commissioner to adopt regulations to implement these provisions. The bill would authorize an insurer to recoup this fee by way of a surcharge on premiums or by including the fee within the insurer's rates, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 22, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 22, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 6. Page 6313.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6).
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-2-7)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Bob Blumenfield
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2138
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2138. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline