School district employees: merit system: appointments.
Summary
Existing law requires all vacancies in the classified service of a school district that has adopted the merit system to be filled from applicants on eligibility lists that are made up from promotional examinations or by appointments made by means of transfer, demotion, reinstatement, or reemployment, as specified. If a vacancy is filled from applicants on an eligibility list, the appointment is required to be made from the eligible candidates having the first 3 ranks on the list who are ready and willing to accept the position. Existing law authorizes, in a school district that has adopted the merit system, an appointment to be made from other than the first 3 ranks on the eligibility list when the ability to speak, read, or write a language in addition to English, or possession of a valid driver's license, is a requirement of the position to be filled, but in that case existing law requires the appointment to be made from among the highest 3 ranks of applicants on the list who meet the special requirements and are ready and willing to accept the position. This bill, until December 31, 2015, in a school district with a pupil population over 400,000, would authorize an appointment to specified classifications of positions to be made from other than the first 3 ranks on the eligibility list if specialized licenses, certifications, knowledge, or ability that cannot reasonably be acquired during the probationary period or a specific gender is required for successful job performance of a position, in which case the appointment would be required to be made from among the highest 3 ranks of applicants on the list who meet the special requirements and are ready and willing to accept the position. The bill also would require a school district that makes an appointment under this provision to study the effectiveness of the selection method, the vacancy rates for each class, and the length of time to hire for each class, and submit a report of its findings to any affected labor union.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Jul 9, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 18, 2012 · Assembly May 17, 2012
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Jun 18, 2012
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Jul 9, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 18, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Jun 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 17, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-5)
assembly
May 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 9).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2125
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2125. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline