Standardized testing: testing accommodations.
Summary
Existing law imposes various requirements on a test sponsor or test agency, as defined, with respect to the administration of standardized tests for purposes of postsecondary education. Existing law provides that a test sponsor that intentionally violates these provisions is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $750 for each violation. This bill would require the test sponsor of the Law School Admission Test to provide testing accommodations to a test subject who is disabled, as specified. The bill would require the process for determining whether to grant an accommodation to be made public, the outcome of the request to be conveyed to the requester within a reasonable amount of time, and the reasons for a denial of a request for accommodation to be stated to the requester in writing. The bill would require that test sponsor to establish a timely appeals process when a request is denied and to clearly post on the Law School Admission Test Internet Web site information regarding refund policies for individuals whose requests for accommodation are denied. The bill would prohibit that test sponsor from notifying a test score recipient that the score of any test subject was obtained by a subject who received an accommodation, and would prohibit that test sponsor from withholding any information that would lead a test score recipient to deduce that a score was earned by a subject who received an accommodation. Under this bill, an intentional violation of these requirements would subject a test sponsor to the above civil penalty.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 26, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 19, 2012
How they voted
58–5
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 70
Apr 19, 2012
D
Democratic44
90% Yea
R
Republican26
69% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 26, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 8. Page 6756.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 20).
upper
May 30, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 19, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-5-7)
assembly
Mar 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 27).
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2122
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2122. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline