State highways: signs for culturally unique and historically significant communities.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law authorizes the department to place signs on state highways directing motorists to culturally unique and historically significant communities within the geographic boundaries of a city, county, or city and county under certain conditions. Among these conditions is a requirement for the governing body of the city, county, or city and county in which the community is located to adopt a resolution that designates the name of the community, defines the geographic boundaries of the community, and requests the department to post the signs. This bill would, until January 1, 2014, authorize the department to also post signs under these provisions in the absence of compliance with the above-referenced resolution requirements, if the governing board of the county in which the community is located adopts a resolution conforming with the above-referenced requirements and the city in which the community is located, if any, provides a letter from the director of transportation or the city official in charge of transportation matters indicating that the city is not opposed to the placement of signs. This bill would also authorize the department to continue to display the signs installed under these provisions after the repeal of these provisions.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Aug 23, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly Apr 23, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
May 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
Apr 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 17).
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
Mar 15, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2095
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2095. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline